In a frenzied effort to follow the federal government’s example in taking away the freedom of the people, Fremont county is trying (in true Obama-fashion) to ramrod through a new ordinance forbidding residents from owning pit bulls (and other similar dog breeds, however that might be defined,) and requiring dog owners to keep their dogs in a “substantial” enclosure (as opposed to running loose.)
Now, I can see why the big city folks like to have their lives legislated. It brings them peace, knowing every eventuality has been legislated out of existence and there will be no surprises in their nine-to-five lives. But here in Island Park things are different. We came here to avoid the rat-race of the city. We believe most human beings are responsible in the way they live their lives and that they don’t need to be babysat by government in every little detail.
Up here, it seems enough that if your dog is a nuisance, the neighbors will ask you politely to keep him off of their property. If you can’t do that, they will take care of the dog themselves. But there isn’t any legislation needed. When most people are honest, friendly, responsible, caring, giving, etc. (like they are here,) you don’t need ordinances. You let people govern themselves and when there are those very few who demonstrate a lack of ability to do so, you make adjustments on a case-by-case basis. You don’t penalize the vast majority of the people because there are a few (very few) who are flakey.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t care for pit bulls and I don’t like other people’s dogs running around on my property. But I think as neighbors we can handle this ourselves. That’s what neighbors do, isn’t it? If you want to keep a dangerous dog (and he’s not in a position to cause harm to me and mine) it’s none of my business. If he bites someone, there’s a lawsuit and the dog is put down. But if you keep him on your own property and he’s not a nuisance to anyone, it’s none of my business what kind of dog you have. But even more importantly, it’s none of big brother’s business!!!
Legislating what kind of dog you can’t have is no different than legislating what kind of gun you can’t have (pistols, assault weapons, etc.) for the exact same reasons: They might hurt someone. They’re only good for attacking / intimidating / doing harm to someone, etc., etc., etc. ad nauseum.
I wonder what will be the next freedom the county (in their infinite wisdom) will try and take away?